 |



 |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |

The last few months have been dull.
I setup a neat MAME/MESS thing and can now play some old arcade
and console games. After configuring this all, getting two broken
xbox pads, breaking one permanently with solder (and then
desoldering braid ... goodbye board parts while attempting to fix
my solder spill), and then making things work OK for two player I
lost interest as is the way with such things and so wasted a large
bit of time. 'Tis what I do.
I mostly have clisp working on EABI ARM/OpenEmbedded. Now
generating a package is a huge PITA because of the hairy clisp
build process and utter lack of documentation for
bitbake. Eventually.
bpt and I are in a startupish now. I need to hack some stuff up
for that this week.
I managed to somehow break my laptop, take it apart entirely,
discover that the power switch was shorted, and then curse at
myself very loudly for not figuring this out before. Of course the
only reason I found this was out because of tapping at the power
button angrily and noticing that it kept turning on after a random
number of taps and turning itself off again after five
seconds...the time it takes for the machine to be forcibly shutoff
with the power button. My wireless seemingly broke because of this
so I tried to take the top off again to fix the antenna cable and
managed to break part of the keyboard frame in the process. Turns
out I just needed to upgrade the card firmware to work with my
shiny new kernel. Now my laptop is held together with electrical
tape.
I need to setup some magic bbdb scoring stuff so that I can use
email again. Once I do this I will abandon realtime electronic
communication.

I have failed yet again to make anything more than a
halfhearted attempt at practicing keyboard. I did manage to fetch
my fancy 76 key keyboard (with weighted keys even) and drum
machine from Maryland and set them up at least. Of course I've
been telling myself I needed to pick piano back up for five years
now. Imagine if I had been capable of making myself do things five
years ago (or ever).
I picked up a copy of Kahlil Gibran's Sand and Foam
printed in 1943 from a nice old bookshop. Now I have four old and
properly bound copies of his works and one in a modern
paperback-in-a-hardcase. I intend to burn the latter in a ritual
against the modern publishing industry and their hatred of
everything I love. I managed to score what looks to be a decent
translation of Epictetus's Discourses and
Enchiridion from the 50s as well. Hardcover books are
nice and I think I shall no longer purchase softcover books. The
only issue comes with the Kierkegaard collection because the
hardcover versions have been out of print since the 80s leading to
problems solvable only by giving old men in smelly bookshops a few
hundred bucks. Ok, maybe that is the problem with everything I
like to read. My bank account finds this disagreeable, but it is a
vain thing and has no interest in beauty.
I finally got back on track with reading stuff and am a few
pages from the end of The Genealogy of Morals and then
have Ecco Homo to read before either Discourses
or Rhetoric. The latter would let me be a jerk when
calling a certain popular politician a dirty lying rhetoritician,
and the former would be better to quiet my mind and help me
reembrace the philosophy of despairing lies so that I remain
functional. Doomed either way I suppose.
I can do five and three quarters of a chinup now. And again
with a half an hour break between. And four a third time. I tried
to pull myself onto a high ledge and failed utterly though so I am
still not functional.

Misery etc.
Goodbye for another two months.

Current Music: Green Carnation (Journey to the End of the Night) - 04: Under Eternal Stars
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |






 |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
So it seems that no one sees things I share on
facebook depsite them being declared interesting,
and no one cares about what I write here because I ramble
incessantly about very boring things. And so here I
present to you a series of things I think are neat to placate
Sir Thomas of the House of Square Burgers.
Trees!
William Blake Is Really Neat
-
Europe:
Spiderwebs! This is one of my favorite Blake plates.
Between the clouds of Urizen the flames of Orc roll
heavy
Around the limbs of Albions Guardian, his flesh
consuming.
Howlings & hissings. shrieks & groans. & voices of
despair
Arise around him in the cloudy Heavens of Albion, Furious
- Jerusalem:
Fancy Moons
I know thy deceit & thy revenges, and unless thou desist
I will certainly create an eternal Hell for thee. Listen!
Be attentive: be obedient! Lo the Furnaces are ready to recieve thee.
I will break thee into shivers: & melt thee in the furnaces of death
I will cast thee into forms of abhorrence & torment if thou
Desist not from thine own will, & obey not my stern command:
I am closd up from my children! my Emanation is dividing
And thou my Spectre art divided against me. But mark
I will compell thee to assist me in my terrible labours. To beat
These hypocritic Selfhoods on the Anvils of bitter Death
I am inspired! I act not for myself: for Albions sake
I now am what I am! a horror and an astonishment
Shuddring the heavens to look upon me: Behold what cruelties
Are practised in Babel & Shinar, & have approachd to Zions Hill
- Jerusalem:
Chariot of Death If I were ever to get something inked upon
my body it would be this neat fiery chariot.
And these the Four in whom the twenty-four appear'd four-fold:
Verulam. London. York. Edinburgh. mourning one towards another
Alas! The time will come, when a mans worst enemies
Shall be those of his own house and family: in a Religion
Of Generation, to destroy by Sin and Atonement, happy Jerusalem.
The Bride and Wife of the Lamb. O God thou art Not an Avenger!
Speaking of Philosophy
- Conversations
of the Taoist Master Fu Hsiang. From the man who brought us
the neat Qi
programming language comes a rather nice set of Taoist
discourses. Our resident nihilist taoist friend Tony approves.
In order to arrive at a state where good and evil are
allowed to exist, a state of separation between me and others
must have come into being. This is the proper meaning of the
Fall. The fruit of the Forbidden Tree is the awareness of
separation and the formation of the ego self. From this
separation arises the possibilities of treachery, deceit, lies
on one hand and acts of altruism, and the overcoming of
self-interest on the other.
Philosophers and Scientists Are Cool
I suppose that is all. Good day.
Tags: comics, deforestation, kierkegaard, trees, william blake Current Music: Mithotyn (Gathered Around the Oaken Table) - 10: Guided by History
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |

 |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
O what is Life & what is Man. O what is Death? Wherefore
Are you my Children. natives in the Grave to where I go
Or are you born to feed the hungry ravenings of Destruction
To be the sport of Accident! to waste in Wrath & Love, a weary
Life. in brooding cares & anxious labours, that prove but chaff.
A few days ago I resolved to finally finish
Jerusalem. As it had been ages since I last picked it
up I naturally had to begin again, but this was not too bad as I
had gotten sidetracked after a mere six plates. I have now
finished the first chapter and am a few plates into the second
(30 out of 100). It has so far proven to be the most
comprehensible of Blake's epics, but this may just be because
I've spent the last couple of years on and off immersed in his
system and mostly understand the meaning behind the
interplay of the four Zoas and his mythological history.
I've filled my head with utterly useless knowledge. Look at me
I can read some obscure Romantic poet's insanity. At least it is
pretty.
I've also started in on the Poetic Edda (Prose and Heroic Lays)
albeit in an old translation from good old project
gutenberg. Norse Mythology is neat, and slowly viking metal is
making a tad bit more sense. Yet more useless knowledge.
I still need to finish On the Genealogy of Morals; I
finished the first essay but two more still remain to be
reread. After Jerusalem I shall resume reading it
methinks.
After many months of being lame and not bothering to look for
an Indian shop, I managed to find one and have procured some green
cardamom pods. Finally my old chai spice blend can be rebalanced
to remove the overpowering ginger via the addition of 30g of
Cardamom and 20g of true cinnamon (yeah that was a bitch
to find, but dear god is it so much better than evil cassia that
mccormick and friends pretend is cinnamon). I should have a bit of
strong and malty Assam tea early next week, and then I can once
again make delicious chai!
I realized that I lack any decent honey at the moment, and so I
googled about for farmer's markets in the region (thousands of
bees swarming everywhere pollinating plants and making tasty
honey). There appears to be a year round one that is rather large
in Raleigh that I was unaware of as I am very lame, and so
tomorrow I shall rectify this as the weather shall be nice and 30
miles of biking sounds like a nice idea (it would be a mere 26,
but I must run through the middle of Cary to grab me some mead for
rituals relating to the New Moon). If they lack honey (it is a bit
early, and who knows maybe all of the local bees died or
something) at least I can maybe get something else. And of course,
the adventure of dodging asshats in cars trying to kill me.
My poor bike is a bit sad at the moment. The suspension is in
serious need of an overhaul, and so I have finally invested in a
grease gun and a few tubes of grease (everyone loves the
Internet). I looked up the service manual for my fork, and it
seems that I was supposed to be injecting grease into it every
couple of months given the frequency I ride, and it has kind of
gone almost two years of near daily riding without any
servicing. Now it goes up and down when I brake hard which is very
ungood. The overhaul at least is not so hard: I must merely remove
the spring, degrease the inside of the fork, replace the spring
and regrease the whole thing, and adjust the travel. Maybe an hour
of work.
Alas, the hubs are also dragging! They too should have been
repacked and given some love every six months. Now I have to get a
cone wrench, bearing grease, and some bearings. The sucky part is
that this is one the trickiest bits of bike maintenance. At the
same time I'll gain a useful skill. It'll be nice to have
lower rolling resistance as well (if I do things properly it'll be
like having a new bike).
I should probably rerun all of my cabling as well, but I am
lazy and that can be put off for a few more months. I do need to
stop being lazy about my front fender though; perhaps on my
adventure tomorrow I can go by the hardware store and pick up hose
clamp and pray that the stays fit on the clamp screws (no braze
ons? Time to hack up a solution).
I was poking about on last.fm looking for shows to go to, and
lo! A beautiful sight passed before mine eyes! Paganfest is coming
to Raleigh so now I get to see awesome pagan metal bands and not
have to somehow get myself to northern Virginia to do so. After
nearly two years of not being able to go to shows I finally get a
good spring of shows: Sabbat, Eluveitie and Tyr, and Symphony
X. Quite the series of shows indeed.
Around Golgonooza lies the land of death eternal! a Land
Of pain and misery and despair and ever brooding melancholy;
In all the Twenty-seven Heavens, numberd from Adam to Luther;
From the blue Mundane Shell. reaching to the Vegetative Earth.
Tags: bicycle, blake, metal, tea Current Music: Symphony X (Paradise Lost) - 01: Oculus ex Inferni
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |

 |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
PRAYER
Father in heaven! Teach us to pray rightly so that our hearts
may open up to you in prayer and supplication and hide no
furtive desire that we know is not acceptable to you, nor any
secret fear that you will deny us anything that will truly be
for our good, so that the laboring thoughts, the restless
mind, the fearful heart may find rest in and through that
alone in which and through which it can be found—by always
joyfully thanking you as we gladly confess that in relation to
you we are always in the wrong. Amen.
If I should speak in a different way, I would remind you of a wisdom
you have certainly frequently heard, a wisdom that knows how to
explain everything easily enough without doing an injustice either to
God or to human beings. A human being is a frail creature, it says; it
would be unreasonable of God to require the impossible of him. One
does what one can, and if one is ever somewhat negligent, God will
never forget that we are weak and imperfect creatures. Shall I admire
more the sublime conceptions of the nature of the Godhead that this
ingenuity makes manifest or the profound insight into the human heart,
the probing consciousness that scrutinizes itself and now comes to the
easy, cozy conclusion: One does what one can? Was it such an easy
matter for you, my listener, to determine how much that is: what one
can? Were you never in such danger that you almost desperately exerted
yourself and yet so infinitely wished to be able to do more, and
perhaps someone else looked at you with a skeptical and imploring
look, whether it was not possible that you could do more? Or were you
never anxious about yourself, so anxious that it seemed to you as if
there were no sin so black, no selfishness so loathsome, that it could
not infiltrate you and like a foreign power gain control of you? Did
you not sense this anxiety? For if you did not sense it, then do not
open your mouth to answer, for then you cannot reply to what is being
asked; but if you did sense it, then, my listener, I ask you: Did you
find rest in those words, "One does what one can"?
Or were you never anxious about others? Did you not see them wavering
in life, those you were accustomed to look up to in trust and
confidence? And did you not then hear a soft voice whisper to you: If
not even those people can accomplish the great things, what then is
life but bad troubles, and faith but a snare that wrenches us out into
the infinite, where we really are unable to live—far better, then, to
forget, to abandon every requirement; did you not hear this voice? For
if you did not hear it, then do not open your mouth to answer, for you
cannot reply to what is being asked about; but if you did hear it, my
listener, I ask you: was it to your comfort that you said "One does
what one can"? Was not the real reason for your unrest that you did
not know for sure how much one can do, that it seems to you to be so
infinitely much at one moment, and at the next moment so very little?
Was not your anxiety so painful because you could not penetrate your
consciousness, because the more earnestly, the more fervently you
wished to act, the more dreadful became the duplexity in which you
found yourself: that you might not have done what you could, or that
you might actually have done what you could but no one came to your
assistance?
So every more earnest doubt, every deeper care is not calmed by the
words: One does what one can. If a person is sometimes in the right,
sometimes in the wrong, who, then, is the one who makes that decision
except the person himself, but in the decision may he not again be to
some degree in the right and to some degree in the wrong? Or is he a
different person when he judges his act than when he acts? Is doubt to
rule, then, continually to discover new difficulties, and is care to
accompany the anguished soul and drum past experiences into it? Or
would we prefer continually to be in the right in the way irrational
creatures are? Then we have only the choice between being nothing in
relation to God or having to begin all over again every moment in
eternal torment, yet without being able to begin, for if we are able
to decide definitely whether we are in the right at the present
moment, then this question must be decided definitely with regard to
the previous moment, and so on further and further back.
Doubt is again set in motion, care again aroused; let us try to calm
it by deliberating on:
THE UPBUILDING THAT LIES IN THE THOUGHT THAT IN
RELATION TO GOD WE ARE ALWAYS IN THE WRONG
To be in the wrong—can any more painful feeling than this be
imagined? And do we not see that people would rather suffer everything
than admit that they are in the wrong? To be sure, we do not sanction
such stubbornness, either in ourselves or in others. We think the
wiser and better way to act is to admit that we are in the wrong if we
actually are in the wrong; we then say that the pain that accompanies
the admission will be like a bitter medicine that will heal, but we do
not conceal that it is a pain to be in the wrong, a pain to admit
it. We suffer the pain because we know that it is to our good; we
trust that sometime we shall succeed in making a more energetic
resistance and may reach the point of really being in the wrong only
in very rare instances. This point of view is very natural and very
obvious to everyone. Thus there is something upbuilding in being in
the wrong, provided that we, in admitting it, build ourselves up by
the prospect that it will more and more rarely be the case. And yet we
did not want to calm doubt by this point of view but rather by
reflecting on the upbuilding in the thought that we are always in the
wrong. But if that first point of view, which provided the hope that
in time one would never be in the wrong, is upbuilding, how then can
the opposite point of view also be upbuilding—the view that wants to
teach us that we are always, in the future as well as in the past, are
in the wrong?
Your life brings you into a multiplicity of relationships with other
people. Some of them love justice and righteousness; others do not
seem to want to practice them—they do you wrong. Your soul is not
hardened to the suffering they inflict upon you in this way, but you
search and examine yourself; you convince yourself that you are in the
right, and you rest calm and strong in this conviction. However much
they outrage me, you say, they still will not be able to deprive me of
this peace—that I know I am in the right and that I suffer wrong. In
this view there is a satisfaction, a joy, that presumably every one of
us has tasted, and when you continue to suffer wrong, you are built up
by the thought that you are in the right. This point of view is so
natural, so understandable, so frequently tested in life, and yet it
is not with this that we want to calm doubt and to heal care but by
deliberating upon the upbuilding that lies in the thought that we are
always in the wrong. Can the opposite point of view, then, have the
same effect?
Your life brings you into a multiplicity of relationships with other
people. To some you are drawn by a more fervent love than to
others. Now, if such a person who is the object of your love were to
do you a wrong, is it not true that it would pain you, that you would
scrupulously examine everything but that you would then say: I know
for sure that I am in the right; this thought will calm me? Ah, if you
loved him, then it would not calm you; you would investigate
everything. You would be unable to perceive anything else except that
he is in the wrong, and yet this certainty would trouble you. You
would wish that you might be in the wrong; you would try to find
something that could speak in his defense, and if you did not find
it, you would find rest only in the thought that you were in the
wrong. Or if you were assigned the responsibility for such a person's
welfare, you would do everything that was in your power, and when the
other person nevertheless paid no attention to it and only caused you
trouble, is it not true that you would make an accounting and say: I
know I have done right by him?—Oh, no! If you loved him, this thought
would only alarm you; you would reach for every probability, and if
you found none, you would tear up the accounting in order to help you
forget it, and you would strive to build yourself up with the thought
that you were in the wrong.
It is painful, then, to be in the wrong and all the more painful the
more often one is in the wrong; it is upbuilding to be in the wrong,
and all the more upbuilding the more often one is in the wrong. This
is indeed a contradiction! How can this be explained except by saying
that in the one case you are forced to acknowledge what in the second
case you wish to acknowledge? But is not the acknowledgement
nevertheless the same; does one's wishing or not wishing have any
influence on it? How can this be explained except by saying that in
the one case you loved, in the other you did not—in other words, in
the one case you were in an infinite relationship with a person, in
the other case a finite relationship? Therefore, wishing to be in the
wrong is an expression of an infinite relationship, and wanting to be
in the right, or finding it painful to be in the wrong, is an
expression of a finite relationship! Hence it is upbuilding to always
be in the wrong—because only the infinite builds up; the finite does
not!
Tags: either/or, kierkegaard Current Music: Einherjer (Dragons of the North) - 02: Dreamstorm
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |

|